Organisation · Contracts Finder · Construction Industry Training Board

Construction Industry Training Board

Identity
organisation:contracts_finder:Construction Industry Training Board — the Contracts Finder key, used as-is. No identity here is invented.
Graph built
5 September 2026

Names in the records

Each spelling a register uses for this entity, and the method that tied it here. A name is never the identity; a similar name is never a match.

As publishedRegisterTied byConfidenceRows
Construction Industry Training BoardContracts Finderexact name within one register1.02

What the records establish

  • Construction Industry Training Board: 2 records of "awarded the contract" between 28 July 2026 and 18 August 2026, £949,981 in total where a figure is published.
All 2 recorded relationships. Kind: FACT — every row is a register's own record; nothing on this page is computed.
RelationshipWithDateAmountDetailRecord
awarded the contractGB-Peterborough: IT Equipment Reuse, Recycling & Disposal18 August 2026£0Repair, maintenance and associated services related to personal computers, office equipment, telecommunications and audio-visual equipmentpublic_contracts
awarded the contractWAN, LAN and Wi-Fi (London Office)28 July 2026£949,981Telecommunications networkpublic_contracts

What this does not establish

The records above establish that Construction Industry Training Board and each entity named appear together in an official register, in the relationship that register records, on the date it records. They do not establish why any donation was made, why any contract was awarded, whether any one record was known to the people behind another, or that any record caused another. No causal inference is made on this page, and nothing here is a finding of any kind against anyone. A reported donation is a lawful, reported transaction; a contract award is a published notice; a seat is a seat.

The same name elsewhere in the records

A register spells another entry exactly as it spells this one. The graph keeps them apart because no register says they are the same, and a shared name is not evidence that they are.

Derived from: public_contracts. Each row above names the table and key it came from and links the official record where one exists. How the graph is built is described at the evidence graph.